morethebook.org header image 2

Population and Climate Change: Can We Talk?

May 19th, 2008 · 2 Comments · food, population

ISTANBUL-The workshop I’ve been attending in this ancient city drew 31 people-ranging from a member of the British parliament to a Dutch women’s rights advocate to a Hungarian environmentalist-to talk about whether it makes sense to bring population into the global debate on climate change.

Tough question, given that most of the responsibility for human-induced global warming stems from the past behavior of wealthier nations, most of whose populations are now growing relatively slowly or not at all. Workshop participants thus worried that taking on population would risk giving a pass to the disproportionately high carbon consumption these nations enjoy.

Many of these participants work to support a concept known by the unwieldy acronym of SRHR-for sexual and reproductive health and rights. Never heard of it? Neither have most people, and that makes the work of these dedicated professionals all the harder. They are promoting, after all, the right of all people to be sexually active when and as they choose, in safety and health, and to conceive a child only if and when they want. Should be pretty basic, but not much of the world prioritizes SRHR or strongly enough supports the health services needed to make it possible for all.

In More: Population, Nature, and What Women Want, I mildly chide some in the SRHR community for eschewing a potential alliance with environmentalists who see the benefits of the concept in reducing unintended childbearing and thus slowing population growth. Disconcertingly, many on the SRHR side also see population as a purely “Southern”-or developing-country-issue. The reality is that unintended pregnancy is to varying degrees common in all countries, and it elevates the populations even of high-consuming nations above what they would be if all reproduction were intentional. The already populous United States, for example, grows faster demographically than some developing countries do-in part because nearly half of all U.S. pregnancies are unintended.

Read more at the Island Press blog Eco-Compass

Tags:

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Albert Kaufman // May 27, 2008 at 1:41 am

    I appreciate the article, but don’t understand why you break it up and point to a different blog… great work. Thanks.

  • 2 Robert Engelman // Jun 4, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    To Albert, I’m not too crazy about the break in the blogs either. I’ll pass on your concern to my colleagues at Island Press who are gracious enough to manage this Website for me, as it’s not something I could do on my own. Thanks for your kind words.

    To Tony, thanks! Watch this space.

Leave a Comment